About Marathon Des Sables

The Marathon Des Sables (MdS) is known as the toughest footrace on Earth. The distance covered is 243km's in the Sahara desert, run in 49 degrees Celsius heat while every athlete carries his or her own equipment, food etc. weighing in at around 9-13kg's.

This blog is aimed at telling my story. I will record my preparation for the MdS 2013 in detail in the hope that it will help my fellow runners.

Friday, 13 December 2013

KAEM 2013 Post Race Report

Introduction
This year’s Kalahari Augrabies Extreme Marathon was generally cooler, but no less tough than before. As with any multi-stage event there are mistakes that are made, elements that are underestimated by the runners but these are balanced by the many personal victories and achievements that we as runners experience multiple times during the day.

This post-race report has two elements, on the one hand I discuss, as always the highly technical elements. I look at how the theory and research match up to the actual runner experience and performance. However, I also share some of my personal experience and views here, so I hope you enjoy this post-race report.

Pre-Race
2013 was an intense race year in that I completed the Addo Elephant run, the Marathon des Sables (MdS) and my second Kalahari Augrabies Extreme Marathon (KAEM). I distinctly remember that on day three of the MdS in Morocco, thinking to myself that maybe I should cut back and do only one multi-stage race per 12-month cycle. However, as most adventure racers and multi-stage racers would confirm, by the time you cross the finish line, these cautionary ideas fly right out the window and we start to plan and look forward to the next race. As so it happened, that four weeks after the MdS, I started training for the KAEM. This time, around, however, my training became even more scientific than usual and I applied many of the things I had learned from the preceding two years research and in specific the research I conducted during the MdS.

Changes were made to my training program, my food, race pack, kit and many additional aspects, including me ‘tapering’ for the first time. The two weeks before the KAEM, I started ‘tapering’, this included very little in the form of training and exercise and very much in the form of food. My standard regime is the exact opposite, little in the form of food (however, nutritional value is high) with a high activity load. Therefore, tapering was a very difficult process to keep up taking as much, or possibly even more, discipline to execute as training does.

Eventually the day arrived to fly down to Upington and start the pre-race process of race briefings, medical checks and kit inspections. It is, as with all these races, an exciting time where we meet the other runners in person, often for the first time. There are old faces, familiar members of the racing fraternity (or specific race family), and new members to meet. Among these new faces are the ‘novices’ to multi-stage endurance races. These ‘novices’ are often highly experienced marathon and even ultra-marathon runners who try their hand at multi-stage races. Other ‘novices’ has had a multi-stage race on their bucket list and will do one or maybe two in their lifetime.

It is this mixture of people from all walks of life, from various countries and each with their own objectives, goals, abilities and fears that makes multi-stage races such an enduring and often life-changing experience.

And it was among this sea of expectation, excitement and fear that I met my roommate (for the pre and post-race period). Altus Schreuder, an intelligent and well-educated person with a great nature and with whom it was easy to communicate (thanks Nadia; you know how to group us). Altus was a multi-stage novice and had his concerns as we all do, even the more experienced among us. We had many chats, recalculated food and kit content and discussed race strategy, tactics and personal maintenance in the days leading up to the start of the event.                

Race Summary (Technical)

Day 1 (19 October 2013)
And so it was that we set off on the Saturday the 19th of October 2013, from the Augrabies Falls National Park. Within the first few kilometres we were running in a light drizzle; which meant that once the ‘rain’ had stopped the humidity went up, something that was unexpected. My previous KAEM race was just hot and dry with little humidity (compared to where I train), so experiencing higher than expected humidity was the first surprise the desert had in-store for us, but it wasn’t the last.

The distance was relatively high, at 26km’s, for a 1st day, which is usually used for acclimatisation. Although we started in cooler weather the temperature peaked at around 35 degree Celsius with a moderate average of 30 degree Celsius for the day. Elevation gain was a reasonable 336 meters. The final few kilometres to the finish, from the last check-point (CP), was tough with a very steep ascent down to the river’s edge, followed by boulder hopping and a final sandy river bed to the end.

I clearly remember selecting my kit for KAEM 2013 and looking at the two sleeping bags in my collection, the one rated with a 5 degree Celsius and the other with a 10 degree Celsius comfort rating. Using KAEM 2012 as my guide I decided to pack the 250g lighter 10 degree Celsius bag, because the Kalahari does not dip that low at night. How I came to regret that decision. The first night was windy and cold and I found it difficult to sleep, something I am not known for. This repeated itself throughout the race which added a new dimension of difficulty to the event. Sleeping badly is as bad as running hungry, it eats away at your mental toughness on the one hand and on the other results in you starting each day with a higher fatigue level than what is comfortable. It is a compounding issue, where environmental factors plus physical and mental race strain together impacts upon your overall condition.

And as always it is the spirit among the runners, both on the route and in the camp, which plays an important role in how you will perform and to what extent this race is enjoyed by each runner. This year’s KAEM did not disappoint, great company, lots of humour and great evening conversations meant that at the end of every long day there was a sense of belonging where the shared experience and hardship bound everyone together. And as always, it is the crew along the way and at each CP that provides encouragement to each and every one. It is their tireless effort, smiles, kindness and words that motivates all of us to push through to the next CP. The crew lies ceaselessly, they are experts at it, but they persist, they tell us how well we are doing, how great we look and how easy the road is from here, it is all lies but it achieves one thing, it provides a moment’s reprieve from the reality of the pain, the tiredness, and the mental anguish, and ultimately provides hope. I personally think that is the mark of a great crew, the ability to let you leave their CP, or aid station, refreshed, in good spirits and with a little hope.
       
Day 2 (20 October 2013)
Day two was a 33km run, that saw us as ascend 643 meters with an average temperature of around 23 degree Celsius. The cooler and wet weather persisted which meant that although cooler the humidity was taking its toll. “Dead-man’s” gorge posed a real problem and I soon realised that my Salomon’s, although having great grip for running over rocks, are useless when you have to climb a near vertical rock that is soaking wet, but persistence and a positive attitude prevailed and I ran to the end of day two enjoying the scenery, cooler weather and simply relishing the moment.

This last point is often neglected by many runners who seem to forget why they are there in the first place. Yes it is a race, and there is a certain pressure that goes along with competing against the clock, yourself and other runners. But multi-stage adventure racing is so much more than the competition; it is about you as an individual losing yourself in the moment, finding the silence, and solitude to hear the voice of your inner child. It is here where we, for a moment, come to understand what is important in life, who we are, and where we are heading. I hope that every person on the planet will come to experience this state of being; it is a place of normality where we are stripped of all the illusions of strength, power and grandeur, and where all that is left, is our vulnerability and our dependency on minimalistic simplicity. It is here where you are simply human again, it is the most invigorating and beautiful place to be, so next time you are out there, live in that moment, it will change your life for ever.       


Day 3 (21 October 2013)
Estienne, our race director, lost his aptitude for mercy at the end of day two, and day three started with a relentless climb out of a gorge. Although the temperature was still somewhat cool, peaking at 30 degree Celsius, and averaging at 22 degree Celsius we had an elevation gain of 621 meters for the day, most of which was covered during the first two or three kilometres. However, once on the top of the mountain the rolling hills showed the beauty of the green Kalahari. The desert sent us a cool breeze that restored us after the initial climb. It was also the day where, once we came out of the mountains, the sand didn’t seem to end for a moment.

Although only 30km’s, the day had other stresses. The first three days was nearly behind us, and what was waiting on the other side of the night was the notorious long-stage. By now, the injuries had turned from moderate discomfort to really painful, the feet was tired, and for some blistered, and physical and mental fatigue was well underway. The ‘ideal’ way to start a 78km run with a back pack…this is after all why we are here.

Personally, I was in good shape with no real injuries or blisters. I didn’t feel fatigued and I ascribed this to my race nutrition and general physical conditioning that preceded the race. Experience, planning and preparation, these three things are vital components in your armour when you set out to run a multi-stage ultra-endurance race.

Sleep was restless for most and the morning of the fourth day came far too quickly.

Day 4 (22 October 2013)
The long stage had finally arrived, it would see us run 78km’s in an average temperature of 27 degree Celsius. Although our elevation gain was only 147 meters for the day, our overall ascend and descend was well in excess of 800 meters. To start off we had some sand but this was limited by Estienne’s standards, there was a certain monotony to some elements of the route that challenged runners more mentally than physically. I was fortunate enough to have a great running partner, Andy Boyle. The two of us stayed together from the beginning of the long stage to the end and Andy, a novice, helped me more than he realise…thanks Andy!

The long stage was, how could I state it clearly, looooooooooooooong. The two of us employed a strict 20km eating and maintenance regime which ensured that we never came close to the depletion point. It was great running with a fellow runner who was there to live the moment as I was. After sunset, and before the moon rose, we stopped for a few minutes, laid on our backs with our eyes closed. When we opened our eyes the sight of millions of stars was overwhelming. Later we sat looking at the moon rising at the second last CP for the day and before we knew it we ran across the finish-line. The daunting long stage was now behind us and tomorrow would be our well-deserved rest day.  

Day 5 (23 October 2013)
Our rest day was, as in 2012, at the river. This beautiful site has so many reasons that make it special, the least of which is that we can just rest for an entire day. Yes we do nothing but eat, sleep, talk and swim, now that is what that inner child is screaming for every day. But what makes this so special is the fact that I was awoken with the call of a fish eagle, to those that have heard it, it is so distinctly Africa and so beautifully natural, it brings a calm that is enforced by the sound of the water flowing over rocks a little further downstream.

During the day, I took, as many other runners, a quick swim; we ‘washed’ some clothes and generally had a great day. The temperature was picking up and I repeatedly woke up during the day, lying in a pool of sweat. It soon became clear that this cooler weather was on the way out, and the two remaining stages were not going to be easy.

Day 6 (24 October 2013)
Early morning we set off on our 43km run that would see us end the day 890 meters higher than where we started. This means that we were climbing gradually for most of the distance with temperatures reaching as high as 37 degree Celsius. But it wasn’t the rise in temperature that would be the toughest part of the day, but rather, the wind. The Kalahari wind blew its fine sand creating a haze that limited visibility and caused as much dehydration as what the heat and sun does.

The route, however, was stunning and at around the halfway point for the day, I decided to test how far I could push my heels with the new inners that were made in Belgium. From this point onwards, I would be running alone, pushing hard to see at what point the heel pain would return. The risk, for me was minimal, I knew that even if my heels blew out as they did during the MdS that the distance left, (around 43km’s to the end of the event), I could walk it and still finish in-time.

I pushed and reached a very reasonable pace of 05:15 per kilometre which I was able to maintain for a five kilometre distance before some heel discomfort set-in, I backed off a little and reduced my pace to around 08:00 per kilometre. I ended the day with a nerve being pinched in my right gluteal muscle, this caused some discomfort in my right calve. The physiotherapists worked on it and I returned to spend my last night out in the Kalahari. The pinched nerve I ascribed to the fact that my legs had not been able to maintain such a high pace for years, the stress, and possible shock to my system had some repercussions, but the knowledge that I could manage the pain effectively, and without the use of drugs, was empowering.

Day 7 (25 October 2013)
This was the last day and my new found pace limit was going to be tested again. I ran the final 26km’s at an average pace of 07:58 per kilometre peaking at 4:58 per kilometre. Once again we ended at an elevation that was 277 meters higher than from where we started, but this is somewhat misleading as our total ascend for the day came closer to 600 meters. The temperatures, were, once again more moderate peaking at 28 degree Celsius.

As the kilometres were covered two opposing emotions came into play, firstly there is the overwhelming feeling of victory. This happens when you reach the point at which you know that even if you would be reduced to crawling that you will finish this race. Yet irrevocably linked to this is the sadness that you feel, knowing that this experience would be over within the next few hours or minutes. It is at this moment that your inner child realises that it will, once again, be pushed down, silenced and locked away, until you allow it to come out and play with the other kids again. That inner child knows that it would have to wait, sometimes, only weeks, but for most of us this would be most likely months, yet for others that inner child might never be allowed to come out and play again.

Then the end is in sight, we have run over moon-rock, crossed the stream and now the familiar KAEM banner, with all the country flags attached to it, comes into view. Here at the end is the crew, some family members and those familiar faces of fellow runners, who, for what-ever reason, didn’t make it. And as quickly as this adventure had started it is over.

Post-Race
The post race activities are equally busy with a spectacular reward ceremony, the now regular charity auction, and reluctant goodbyes. And as we part ways we know that it will be another year before old friends meet up again, and until then, I wish all my fellow runners a wonderful farewell, many happy miles on the road or the track and a safe return…see you soon.

General
The ‘cooler’ temperature and the rain gave the perception that KAEM 2013 was easier than KAEM 2012, but is this a true reflection of KAEM 2013? The table below provides a summary which I will discuss briefly.




2012
2013
Day 1


Distance (km)
29
26
Maximum Temp (deg C)
41
35
Average Temp (deg C)
32.7
30
Elevation (meters)
224
336
Between 2012 and 2013 there is no significant difference, the average temperature for the day differed with only around 2,7 degree Celsius, but the total ascend for the day was much higher. As the distance was shorter the effort required to complete the day did not differ significantly, from a physiological perspective, from that of 2012. The night temperature was significantly cooler which has an impact on nutritional requirement as well as sleep quality. Additional factors to contend with during 2013 compared to 2012 were the rain and increased humidity. Taking all aspects into consideration I would say that day one during 2013 was on par with day one 2012. 
Day 2


Distance (km)
38
33
Maximum Temp (deg C)
51
30
Average Temp (deg C)
29.9
22.7
Elevation (meters)
562
643
In 2012 the distance was higher as was the temperature compared to 2013. There is no disputing the fact that day 2 of 2012 had a significant physical and psychological impact on the runners. This made the 2012 run extremely tough. 2013 had cooler weather which suited most runners, however, the rain and associated humidity added its own toughness combining this with very cool and even cold night temperatures added another dimension to the experience. Overall, however, I do consider day 2 during 2012 to have been one of the toughest run days I have ever experienced. 
Day 3


Distance (km)
30
30
Maximum Temp (deg C)
41
30
Average Temp (deg C)
34.7
22.3
Elevation (meters)
375
621
Day three during this year’s run ended-up being a constant climb; this was similar to day three during 2012, which also started with a climb, however, it was significantly more during 2013. Between 2012 and 2013 there was a significant average temperature difference which meant that once again the cooler temperatures during this year’s run gave a perception that it was easier. I would, once again, place day 2 for 2012 and 2013 on an even par.     
Day 4


Distance (km)
78
78
Maximum Temp (deg C)
37
33
Average Temp (deg C)
28.3
26.5
Elevation (meters)
472
147
The 2013 long-run started with a higher temperature than the preceding two days. This was the opposite during 2012 where our long-run was run in significantly cooler weather. The problem during 2013 was that acclimatisation was not taking place; the constant variation between hot, cold, windy and wet meant that the experiencing higher temperatures on the long-run had a direct physiological impact. During the 2012 race there was some reprieve from the excessive heat, with a cool wind that made the day much more manageable. 2012 had significantly more climbing which off-set the cooler benefit compared to this year. Again, I would say that considering everything, that day 4 of 2012 and 2013 were equal in their difficulty level.       
Day 6


Distance (km)
43
43
Maximum Temp (deg C)
36
37
Average Temp (deg C)
29
33.5
Elevation (meters)
846
890
Day 6, during this year’s race, was extremely difficult with lots of climbing in rising temperatures (the highest for the race) combined with lots of wind. The dehydration effect of the wind on top of the higher temperatures should not be ignored. During the 2012 race the temperature was still declining and compared to the shock of day two’s 51 degree Celsius played a less significant role. I recall a light and cool breeze during 2012 which helped. For me personally the 2013 day 6 was more difficult than the 2012 run.  
Day 7


Distance (km)
24
26
Maximum Temp (deg C)
40
28
Average Temp (deg C)
31.9
23.1
Elevation (meters)
334
277
I found this year’s day seven relatively easy although it didn’t differ significantly to that of 2012. Rating the two day’s on their data only, I would rate the final day of 2012 slightly more difficult to that of 2013, but this would be so slight that I would be hard-pressed to conclude that 2012 was the winner in-terms of difficulty.  

Overall, the two (2012 and 2013) races were very similar in their impact on the runners, something which we tend to contextualise as difficulty. In essence, distance is distance and any distance over 5km’s taxes the human body significantly. Adaptability is what multi-stage racing is all about and KAEM 2013 demanded no less adjustment and adaptation than KAEM 2012. The 2012 adaptation demand was predominantly centred on high temperatures, in excess of 40 degree Celsius. However, the 2013 demand was much more diverse, with runners having to adjust to cold, hot, wind, rain, and humidity. There were more “roads” to run on this year which was slightly less taxing on concentration levels.

Again, this year, as in previous years there were runners that did not complete (DNC) the race. I have, over the years, and through my research, identified a trend that points to an overreaction to symptoms of dehydration, as one of the main causes why runners don’t complete the race. In essence, it is impossible to run these types of distances, with a back-pack, in such extreme conditions and remain hydrated and adequately fed. Inexperience of both runner and medical personnel in this regard, I believe, has seen many runners withdrawing or being withdrawn pre-emptively. I don’t, for one moment, under play the danger of dehydration nor do I suggest that a dehydrated runner should not withdraw or be withdrawn from a race. However, what I do suggest is that an assessment should be made based upon the individual’s ability to become hydrated again within an hour or two’s rest at a CP. Most races allow a runner to receive intravenous hydration by the medical personnel, against a time penalty, and I think that this should be the first course of action. Post “forced” hydration briefing and an assessment an hour or two later, should provide a far more accurate measurement of the true condition of a runner. During dehydration, a certain irrationality comes into play, combined with fright and fear, this has a much higher psychological effect than physiological impact, and both runners and medical personnel must take this into consideration.             

A cautionary note to anyone who considers running the KAEM, once you have your race-book in hand you will see the name Daberas. This is an area of sand, and more sand, and even more sand. The dry river beds are dryer and sandier here than at any other place on the planet. I think this was the place, where during creation, all sand that was left over was dumped, and for any runner who ever experiences Daberas the word has as much dread and apocalyptic connotation as what Armageddon or Wormwood has. So within the vicinity of, and in the actual Daberas area, you have to manage your fluid intake carefully, your pace, and your overall physical condition. As I have stated earlier, adaptation is key in any multi-stage event, and by adapting to both terrain and environment your chances of success are greatly improved.    

The main reasons why runners do not complete an event are (a) dehydration, (b) foot blisters and (c) psychological “breakdown”. All three of these are manageable and should never be allowed to escalate to the point that a runner has to withdraw or has to be withdrawn. It is all about management, your nutrition, fluids, rest, feet, pace, thoughts, expectations, goals, etc.         

Kit and Nutrition
I feel that my kit was spot-on, with the exception of having taken a sleeping bag with a comfort rating that was insufficient for the KAEM this year. I will most probably take my warmer sleeping bag for the 2014 event and end-up sleeping above it then, but that is what adventure racing is all about. We take calculated risks and then adapt to the ‘curve-balls’. I won’t discuss my items here as it was published in my pre-race report.

My food was spot on, with adequate reserves. I took 19,312 kCal’s which translates to 0.94 kCal’s per kilogram of body weight per race kilometre. I had given-away and brought back a total of 2,241 kCals which means that I had an 11.6% reserve. I didn’t go hungry during the event, I remained adequately fuelled, and my ‘low’ nutrition had no significant impact on my performance. So for future events, I will peg my nutrition to somewhere between 0.83 and 0.94 kCal’s per kilogram of body weight per race kilometre.      

Conclusion
I hope that this entry was both insightful and entertaining, and hopefully it served to motivate many of you. Once again thank you for reading my blog.


Genis 

Thursday, 12 December 2013

CANON G15 Review

Introduction

During 2013 I had the opportunity to test the Canon G15 during three ultra-extreme events. The first was in March at the Addo Elephant trail run in the Eastern Cape, the second was in April during the Marathon des Sables (MdS) in Morocco and the third was during October at the Kalahari Augrabies Extreme Marathon (KAEM) in the Northern Cape.

I was surprised how well the G15 coped with the heat, sand, humidity and wet conditions. As both the MdS and KAEM are multi-stage desert races my initial fear was that the sand at both these events may cause the retractable lens to malfunction, this never happened. My second concern was that the high temperatures may impact significantly upon the camera, either draining its battery, or causing some other malfunction, this also didn’t happen. From the outset, therefore, the quality of the camera and its ability to withstand an extreme environment met my first criteria more than adequately. It’s worthwhile noting that although the camera is rated to operate at a maximum temperature of 40 degree Celsius, the MdS showed that this camera can work at temperatures well above that.

Before I delve into a more detailed review, it’s worthwhile looking at the general specifications of the camera:


Camera Type
Compact digital still camera with built-in flash, 5x Optical, 4x Digital and 20x Combined Zoom with Optical Image Stabilizer
Sensor
12.1 Megapixel, 1/1.7-inch CMOS
Total Pixels
Approx. 13.3 Megapixels
Effective Pixels
Approx. 12.1 Megapixels
Focal Length
6.1 (W) – 30.5 (T) mm (35mm film equivalent: 28–140mm)
Digital Zoom
4.0x
Focusing Range
Normal:  2.0 in. (5cm) – infinity (W), 1.3 ft. (40cm) – infinity (T)
Normal with Tele-converter: 2.0 in. (5cm) – infinity (W), 2.5 ft. (75cm) – infinity (T)
Auto: 0.4 in. (1cm) – infinity (W), 1.3 ft. (40cm) – infinity (T)
Auto with Tele-converter: 2.5 ft. (75cm) – infinity (T)
Macro AF: 0.4 in. – 1.6 ft. (1–50cm) (W)
Autofocus System
TTL Autofocus, Manual Focus
Viewfinder
Real-image zoom viewfinder
LCD Monitor
3.0-inch TFT Color LCD with wide viewing angle
LCD Pixels
Approx. 922,000 dots
LCD Coverage 
Approx. 100%
Maximum Aperture 
f/1.8 (W), f/2.8 (T)
Shutter Speed
1–1/4000 sec.
15–1/4000 sec. (in Tv and M modes) 
ISO Sensitivity
Auto, ISO 80, 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 320, 400, 500, 640, 800, 1250, 1600, 2000, 2500, 3200, 4000, 5000, 6400, 8000, 10000, 12800
Light Metering Method
Evaluative, Center-weighted average, Spot
Exposure Control Method
Manual Exposure, Program Shift, Safety Shift, AE Lock
Exposure Compensation
Still Images: ±3 stops in 1/3-stop increments
Videos: ±3 stops in 1/3-stop increments (not available during shooting)
White Balance Control
Auto, Daylight, Cloudy, Tungsten, Fluorescent, Fluorescent H, Flash, Underwater, Custom 1, Custom 2
Built-in Flash
Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off
Flash Range
1.6 ft. – 23 ft. (W), 1.6 – 15 ft. (T) (50cm – 7.0m (W), (50cm – 4.5m (T))
Recycling Time 
10 sec. or less (battery voltage: 7.4 V)
Flash Exposure Compensation
±2 stops in 1/3-stop increments
Hot Shoe Availability
Available
Shooting Modes
C1, C2, M, Av, Tv, P, Auto, Movie Digest, SCN, Creative Filters, Movie
Portrait, Smooth Skin, Smart Shutter, High-Speed Burst HQ, Handheld NightScene, Underwater, Snow, Fireworks, Stitch Assist
High Dynamic Range, Nostalgic, Fish-eye Effect, Miniature Effect, Toy Camera Effect, Soft Focus, Monochrome, Super Vivid, Poster Effect, Color Accent, Color Swap
Standard, iFrame Movie, Super Slow Motion Movie
Smile, Wink Self-timer, Face Self-timer
Photo Effects
My Colors Off, Vivid, Neutral, Sepia, Black & White, Positive Film, Lighter Skin Tone, Darker Skin Tone, Vivid Blue, Vivid Green, Vivid Red, Custom Color
Self-Timer
Approx. 10-sec. delay/approx. 2-sec. delay/custom
Wireless Control
Not Available
Electronic Level
Dual axis
Continuous Shooting
Normal: Approx. 2.1 shots/sec. (in P mode)
Approx. 10 shots/sec. (in High-Speed Burst HQ)
AF: Approx. 0.9 shots/sec. (in P mode)
Approx. 5.2 shots/sec. (in High-Speed Burst HQ)
LV: Approx. 0.9 shots/sec. (in P mode)
Storage Media
SD Memory Card, SDHC Memory Card, SDXC Memory Card
File Format
Design rule for Camera File system, DPOF (Version 1.1) compliant
Image Compression
Superfine / Fine
JPEG Compression Mode
Still Image: Exif. 2.3 (JPEG)
Video: MOV (Image: H.264; Audio: Linear PCM (Stereo)
Number of Recording Pixels 
Still Images:
1) 16:9 – Large: 4000 x 2248; Medium 1: 2816 x 1584; Medium 2: 1920 x 1080; Small: 640 x 360; RAW: 4000 x 2248
2) 3:2 – Large: 4000 x 2664; Medium 1: 2816 x 1880; Medium 2: 1600 x 1064; Small: 640 x 424; RAW: 4000 x 2664
3) 4:3 – Large: 4000 x 3000; Medium 1: 2816 x 2112; Medium 2: 1600 x 1200; Small: 640 x 480; Raw: 4000 x 3000
4) 1:1 – Large: 2992 x 2992; Medium 1: 2112 x 2112; Medium 2: 1200 x 1200; Small: 480 x 480; RAW: 2992 x 2992
5) 4:5 – Large: 2400 x 3000; Medium 1: 1696 x 2112; Medium 2: 960 x 1200; Small: 384 x 480; RAW: 2400 x 3000

Videos:
Full HD 1920 x 1080: 24 fps (23.976)
HD 1280 x 720: 30 fps (29.97)
iFrame Movie HD 1280 x 720: 30 fps (29.97)
Movie Digest HD 1280 x 720: 30 fps (29.97)
Miniature Effect HD 1280 x 720: 6 fps / 3 fps / 1.5 fps
Miniature Effect 640 x 480: 6 fps / 3 fps / 1.5 fps
Super Slow Motion Movie 640 x 480: 120 fps
Super Slow Motion Movie 320 x 240: 240 fps
640 x 480: 30 fps (29.97)
Video Out
NTSC/PAL (dedicated connector (female) with unified type of digital, audio and video)
Mini-HDMI connector
Audio Out
Stereo (dedicated connector (female) with unified type of digital, audio and video)
Other
SD memory card slot; direct connection to Canon SELPHY, PIXMA Photo Printers & PictBridge compatible printers
Power Source
Battery Pack NB-10L, Compact Power Adapter CA-PS700 (included with AC Adapter Kit ACK-DC80)
Shooting Capacity
Approx. 350 shots using LCD monitor
Approx. 770 shots when LCD monitor is off
Playback Time
Approx. 7 hours
Operating Temperature
32–104°F/0–40°C
Operating Humidity
10–90%
Dimensions (W x H x D)
4.20 x 2.99 x 1.58" (106.6 x 75.9 x 40.1 mm)
Weight
12.4 oz. (352g)




Look & Feel


The G15 has a solid look and feel; it sits well within your hand which helps with stabilization of the camera when taking photos. It has a sturdy design with easy access to its selector dials and buttons. I found the ‘exposure compensation dial’ to be somewhat in the way which means that I would, on occasion, make adjustments which was not intended.




When using two hands to stabilise the camera during low-light shooting my left hand index finger always seems to be in the way, preventing the ‘popup flash’ from ‘popping-up”. For the rest of the dials and buttons, I had no problem, reaching or using any of them. To be fair, however, one must realise that the G15 is still a point and shoot camera although it has a range of manual features which makes it a highly versatile camera. To pack this manual capability into a point and shoot body is no small feat with body real-estate being very limited. As with most point and shoot, and even armature DSLR’s the popup flash is limited and one could rather make use of a stand-alone flash for which the G15 has a hot-shoe.

Features

The G15 has a host of shooting modes and photo effects that delivers some additional capability to a well-designed camera. It is capable of taking up to 10 frames per second in High-Speed Burst HQ mode, which is really great for outdoor-adventure sport. Some of the shooting modes (such as HDR requires the use of a tri-pod which, in self-sufficiency races are in short supply). In essence not all of the capability will be accessible to photographers that don’t have supporting aids. There are, however, enough features that can be used while on the run. The optical zoom is excellent and provides sufficient zooming capability for close-up shooting to the user, but as with all cameras the digital zoom element has very little value, particularly as it pertains to image quality. For the adventure racer who would like to snap wildlife or fellow runners that may be some distance off, the optical zoom is somewhat limiting.


During KAEM 2012, I tested the Nikon V1, and was able to capture excellent photos of distant subject matter. However, to do so I had carried the V1 body and three lenses with a total weight of nearly three times that of the Canon G15. There are always trade-offs where weight is concerned and for the typical adventure racer the G15 is that balance. It finds the sweet-spot between quality, features, and weight, delivering sufficient capability for most circumstances. 
      

  
Using the G15

Still Images

The quality and sharpness of the G15 provides excellent scope for a range of photographic experiences. The following images were taken during the 2013 MdS and are intended to demonstrate image quality, clarity, sharpness etc. 




In this photo I attempted to convey some information about the intensity of the sun, even early in the morning. The G15 provided the capability for me to frame the picture with the sun as central image without losing the blue of the surrounding sky.




Sunsets in the desert are always uniquely beautiful. In this image the variation in color emanating from a bright whit center, to a yellow and eventually orange spectrum combined with a solid black lower half demonstrates how the G15 is capable of capturing the finest detail without compromising on color or quality.   




The next photo captures a sun-rise about 30-minutes before I completed the MdS long-stage which saw me run through the night. I wanted to show the beauty of the new rising sun, but at the same time convey the message of the desolation, the loneliness, that is found in the desert. Again the G15 was able to deliver. The space, the sun and the variation in colour said exactly what I intended and the G15 delivered image sharpness, colour accuracy and image quality.




In this the final MdS image, I was trying to capture what the Sahara desert is all about, the romantic image of sand dune upon sand dune, the size, the scale and the lack of forgiveness that this environment without trees and shade throws at anyone who enters her. Again the G15 captured in crisp intensity what I was trying to say.




Tanya and I came across this berg adder while running the Addo Elephant in March this year. The G15 did a great job capturing the detail of this beautiful reptile who was somewhat stressed by the time we reached him.

Video

The G15 allows you to take really great videos; the lens provides high quality images. This feature is great for video diarising; however, the battery life of the G15 is greatly diminished when using the camera in video mode. This is an important consideration for adventure racers for whom weight is an important issue.   

Conclusion

The Canon G15 is a lightweight, high quality camera with many automatic and manual features to appeal to all photographers, from amateur to professional. However, its real appeal for the ultra-adventure racer is the balance between the G15’s weight and quality. Here the Canon is in a class of its own; it is robust, easy to use, and compact and produces both high quality stills and video. The few negatives that I mentioned are peripheral and do not detract from the great features of the camera. I can strongly recommend the G15 to ultra-endurance, adventure and self-sufficiency racers who place a high premium on light-weight items.